IN THE MATTER OF PLANE CCA CUT 532. In FINE Proceedings. F-0606-1646.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board August 3, 1954. Fine — Section 273 of Immigration and Nationality Act — Not incurred where visa not required by reason of 8 C.F.R. 211.3. Since 8 C.F.R. […]
Category: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Opinions
IN THE MATTER OF K—-, 2 IN Dec. 838 (BIA 1947)
IN THE MATTER OF K—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-5361313.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board April 4, 1947. Approved by Attorney General April 28, 1947. Suspension of deportation — Section 19 (c) 2 of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended — Discretion. Though an alien’s […]
IN THE MATTER OF M—- U—-, 2 IN Dec. 92 (BIA 1944)
IN THE MATTER OF M—- U—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-5981027 (56170/505)Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board May 12, 1944. Admission of Crime — Theft — Juvenile Delinquency — California. An admission of the commission of “theft” in a State jurisdiction (California), where the offense […]
IN THE MATTER OF V—-, 7 IN Dec. 348 (BIA 1956)
MATTER OF V—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-7934061Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board November 15, 1956 Suspension of deportation — Section 244 (a), Immigration and Nationality Act — Not granted unless outstanding equities or factors are present to supplement minimum statutory requirements. Suspension of deportation, pursuant […]
IN THE MATTER OF BOIREAU, 10 IN Dec. 622 (BIA 1964)
Interim Decision Number 1357 MATTER OF BOIREAU. Application for PERMISSION TO REAPPLY. A-15207589Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Acting Regional Commissioner June 1, 1964 Permission to reapply for admission, pursuant to section 212(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as a crewman following deportation in 1963 […]
IN THE MATTER OF SUN, 15 IN Dec. 307 (BIA 1975)
Interim Decision Number 2385 MATTER OF LOO BING SUN. In Deportation Proceedings. A-12874785Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 21, 1975 Respondent moved that the Board reconsider its decision of February 10, 1972, which affirmed the decision of the immigration judge denying respondent’s motion to […]
IN THE MATTER OF AU YEUNG, 16 IN Dec. 540 (BIA 1978)
Interim Decision Number 2655 MATTER OF AU YEUNG. In Visa Petition Proceedings. A-13856216Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board June 28, 1978 (1) The Board of Immigration Appeals does not have jurisdiction to consider whether a beneficiary of a visa petition, who was once accorded lawful […]
IN THE MATTER OF RAYCHAUDHURI, 11 IN Dec. 715 (BIA 1966)
Interim Decision Number 1617 MATTER OF RAYCHAUDHURI. In Visa Petition Proceedings. A-14962675Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by District Director May 6, 1966 Since a zoologist is a member of the professions within the meaning of section 101(a)(32), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by P.L. 89-236, […]
MATTER OF SILVER DRAGON CHINESE RESTAURANT, 19 IN Dec. 401 (Comm. 1986)
Interim Decision Number 3017 MATTER OF SILVER DRAGON CHINESE RESTAURANT. In Visa Petition Proceedings. A-24551321.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Commissioner August 13, 1986. (1) An occupational preference petition may be filed on behalf of a prospective employee who is a shareholder in the corporation. The […]
IN THE MATTER OF PAYAN, 14 IN Dec. 58 (BIA 1972)
Interim Decision Number 2128 MATTER OF PAYAN. In Deportation Proceedings. A-12618819Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 3, 1972. (1) An ex parte statement of a Government witness is not, for lack of cross-examination, precluded from meeting the test of clear, convincing and unequivocal evidence […]