IN THE MATTER OF M—-. In STATUS DETERMINATION Proceedings. 0300-358494Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Central Office May 28, 1951 Citizenship — Expatriation — Section 3 of the act of March 2, 1907 — Applicability of statutory bar to expatriation during time of war — Section […]
Category: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Opinions
IN RE GARCIA, 24 IN Dec. 179 (BIA 2007)
Interim Decision Number 3565 In re Viviana GARCIA, Respondent. File A97 149 523. Dallas.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided May 31, 2007. An application for special rule cancellation of removal is a continuing one, so an applicant can continue to accrue physical presence until the issuance of […]
IN THE MATTER OF D—-, 2 IN Dec. 836 (BIA 1947)
IN THE MATTER OF D—-. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. A-6322982.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board April 1, 1947. Crime involving moral turpitude — Obtaining money under false pretenses — Violation of section 67 of the Unemployment Insurance Act of 1945 (Canada) The offense of obtaining money […]
IN THE MATTER OF P____ C____, 8 IN Dec. 670 (BIA 1960)
MATTER OF P____ C____. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-10172681Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board June 1, 1960 Deportability — Section 241(a)(11) — Conviction in New York for possession of narcotics — Nature of drug ascertained from police affidavit and laboratory report. Conviction in New York for […]
IN THE MATTER OF D—-, 9 IN Dec. 605 (BIA 1962)
MATTER OF D—-. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. A-11149738.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board April 4, 1962. Crime involving moral turpitude — 18 U.S.C. 545 — Smuggling with intent to defraud the United States. Conviction for smuggling with intent to defraud the United States in violation of […]
IN THE MATTER OF C____, 8 IN Dec. 276 (BIA 1959)
MATTER OF C____. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-2471655Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 3, 1959 Deportation order — Collateral attack not permitted after alien has been deported — Deportation hearing — Lodged charges authorized in section 242(f) proceedings. (1) No collateral attack is permitted on […]
IN THE MATTER OF R—-, 5 IN Dec. 505 (BIA 1953)
IN THE MATTER OF R—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-8015055Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board October 28, 1953 Communist Party of Great Britain — Deportability under the act of October 16, 1918, as amended, based on membership prior to entry — Time of entry and […]
IN THE MATTER OF L—-, 2 IN Dec. 54 (BIA 1944)
IN THE MATTER OF L—-. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. 56156/336Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board February 24, 1944. Crime Involving Moral Turpitude — Lesiones — Violation of Article 193 of the Penal Code of Sonora, Mexico. Where the statutory definition of lesiones embraces crimes which […]
IN THE MATTER OF MARTINEZ-SOLIS, 14 IN Dec. 93 (BIA 1972)
Interim Decision Number 2135 MATTER OF MARTINEZ-SOLIS. In Deportation Proceedings. A-14615365Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 22, 1972. (1) The action of the Board in its prior order remanding the case to the special inquiry officer for further investigation and a reopened hearing, did […]
IN THE MATTER OF W—-, 6 IN Dec. 210 (BIA 1954)
IN THE MATTER OF W—-. In VISA PETITION Proceedings. VP 8-3340.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board July 15, 1954. Preference quota status — Section 203 (a) (4) of Immigration and Nationality Act — Sister — Parents never married. To establish eligibility for preference quota status […]