Interim Decision Number 1425 MATTER OF YOUNG. In Visa Petition Proceedings. A-8869467Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by District Director September 8, 1964 First preference quota status under section 203(a)(1), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, as a dentist, is accorded the beneficiary of a petition filed […]
Category: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Opinions
IN THE MATTER OF T____, 8 IN Dec. 529 (BIA 1960)
MATTER OF T____. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-7080184Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board January 20, 1960 Marriage — Between uncle and niece — Lawful for immigration purposes in some instances — Voidable, not void, in Pennsylvania. (1) Marriage of uncle and niece valid under the law […]
IN THE MATTER OF J—-, 2 IN Dec. 892 (BIA 1947)
IN THE MATTER OF J—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-3192373.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board June 10, 1947. Approved by Attorney General June 17, 1947. Suspension of deportation — Section 19 (c) (2) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended — Good moral character — […]
IN THE MATTER OF P—- G—-, 5 IN Dec. 309 (BIA 1953)
IN THE MATTER OF P—- G—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. E-069269 A-4273315Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board June 26, 1953 Narcotics — Marihuana — Planting and cultivating first step in manufacture or production — Deportability under section 241 (a) (11) of the Immigration and Nationality […]
IN THE MATTER OF SINGH, 13 IN Dec. 439 (BIA 1969)
Interim Decision Number 2017 MATTER OF SINGH. In Section 246 Proceedings. A-11400285Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board December 19, 1969 The running of the five-year limitation provision of section 246 of the Immigration and Nationality Act is tolled by the service upon the alien of […]
IN THE MATTER OF V—-, 2 IN Dec. 606 (BIA 1946)
IN THE MATTER OF V—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. 2223768 (56169/114).Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board June 4, 1946. Approved by Attorney General August 1, 1946. Seventh proviso relief — Section 3 of the Immigration Act of 1917 — Discretion — Voluntary departure — Section 19 […]
IN THE MATTER OF PLANE “N—-6104—-C”, 6 IN Dec. 819 (BIA 1955)
IN THE MATTER OF PLANE “N—-6104—-C”. In FINE Proceedings. F-0300-7271.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board December 20, 1955. Fine — Section 273 (a), Immigration and Nationality Act — Applicable to carrier engaged in private commercial enterprise and violation occurs while under contract to United States […]
IN THE MATTER OF T—-, 2 IN Dec. 290 (BIA 1945)
IN THE MATTER OF T—- AND MATTER OF D—-. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. A-5972903 (56175/164)Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 2, 1945 Immigrants — Nonquota status — Unmarried alien children under 18 born in quota country — Accompanying parent born in nonquota country and entitled […]
IN THE MATTER OF BUENAVENTURA, 12 IN Dec. 754 (BIA 1967)
Interim Decision Number 1869 MATTER OF BUENAVENTURA. In Visa Petition Proceedings. A-17192986.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by District Director November 2, 1967. Since the minimum requirements for professional recognition as a school counselor consists of graduate level work in the guidance field plus at least one […]
IN THE MATTER OF VELASQUEZ, 19 IN Dec. 377 (BIA 1986)
Interim Decision Number 3011 MATTER OF VELASQUEZ. In Deportation Proceedings. A-26389579.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board April 9, 1986. (1) There is a strong presumption that an attorney’s decision to concede an alien’s deportability in a motion for change of venue was a reasonable tactical […]