IN THE MATTER OF C—- C—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-6732114Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board April 27, 1948 “Remained longer” (seaman) — Deportation charge — Immigration Act of 1924 — Opportunity to depart, in case prevented from departing in accordance with the terms of his […]
Category: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Opinions
IN RE SMALL, 23 IN Dec. 448 (BIA 2002)
Interim Decision Number 3476 In re Anderson David Justin SMALL, Respondent. File A22 525 186. Oakdale.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided June 4, 2002. A misdemeanor offense of sexual abuse of a minor constitutes an aggravated felony under section 101(a)(43)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 […]
IN THE MATTER OF P—-, 2 IN Dec. 887 (BIA 1947)
IN THE MATTER OF P—-. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. A-6616401.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board June 6, 1947. Crime involving moral turpitude — Breaking and entering and theft (Canada) — Violation of section 458 (a) of the Criminal Code of Canada-“Joy — Riding” (Canada) — Violation […]
IN THE MATTER OF B—-, 1 IN Dec. 593 (BIA 1943)
IN THE MATTER OF B—-. IN EXCLUSION PROCEEDINGS. 56156/347Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board November 12, 1943. Contract laborer — Chorus dancer. A professional chorus dancer is not inadmissible as a contract laborer. EXCLUDED BY BOARD OF SPECIAL INQUIRY: Act of 1924 — Immigrant […]
IN THE MATTER OF K—-, 9 IN Dec. 121 (BIA 1960)
MATTER OF K—-. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. A-10970591.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board October 20, 1960. Recommendation against deportation — Section 241(b) — Effect upon excludability. (1) Recommendation against deportation complying with requirements of section 241(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act held effective to relieve […]
IN THE MATTER OF A—-, 7 IN Dec. 327 (R.C. 1956)
MATTER OF A—-. In SECTION 212 (c) Proceedings. A-3372659Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Regional Commissioner September 19, 1956 Waiver of ground of inadmissibility — Nunc pro tunc exercise of the discretion contained in section 212 (c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act may be accorded […]
IN THE MATTER OF TUCKER, 12 IN Dec. 328 (BIA 1967)
Interim Decision Number 1758 MATTER OF TUCKER. In Deportation Proceedings. A-17455405.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board July 25, 1967. Respondent, who after arrival in the United States was not employed as a maid or domestic for which employment she had been issued prior to entry […]
IN THE MATTER OF VILLARBA-REYES, 10 IN Dec. 17 (BIA 1962)
Interim Decision Number 1234 MATTER OF VILLARBA-REYES. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-11481354Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board July 27, 1962 (1) An alien nonimmigrant enlisted abroad under the Act of June 30, 1950, as amended (Lodge Act), who returns to the United States as a member […]
IN THE MATTER OF CHANG, 16 IN Dec. 90 (BIA 1977)
Interim Decision Number 2550 MATTER OF CHANG. In Deportation Proceedings. A-18473666Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board January 18, 1977. (1) Respondent conceded deportability under section 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as a nonimmigrant who remained in the United States beyond the date authorized. […]
IN THE MATTER OF ALLISON, 12 IN Dec. 835 (BIA 1968)
Interim Decision Number 1894 MATTER OF ALLISON. In Visa Petition Proceedings. A-17106722.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board July 31, 1968. Where evidence in the form of a decree of the District Court of Woodward County, State of Oklahoma, establishes that the Mexican “mail order” divorce […]