Interim Decision Number 1399 MATTER OF PRIETO-PEREZ. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. A-13013535Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board October 16, 1964 A dual national of the United States and Mexico who, upon petition to the city government of Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico, in which he described himself […]
Category: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Opinions
IN THE MATTER OF S—-, 7 IN Dec. 469 (BIA 1957)
MATTER OF S—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-8940918Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board May 24, 1957 Presumption of validity of second marriage, California — Good moral character — Bigamous marriage precludes establishing eligibility for discretionary relief. (1) Under California law, the presumption of the validity of […]
IN THE MATTER OF SALVIEJO, 13 IN Dec. 557 (BIA 1970)
Interim Decision Number 2042 MATTER OF SALVIEJO. In Deportation Proceedings. A-19173484Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board April 17, 1970 Application for a waiver of the visa requirements under section 211(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, was properly denied since respondent, a native and citizen […]
IN THE MATTER OF MEZA, 20 IN Dec. 257 (BIA 1991)
Interim Decision Number 3146 MATTER OF MEZA. In Deportation Proceedings. A-17970904.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board May 22, 1991. (1) Pursuant to prior precedent decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals, a waiver under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § […]
IN THE MATTER OF V—-, 6 IN Dec. 186 (BIA 1954)
IN THE MATTER OF V—-. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. A-1396530.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board June 30, 1954. Excludability — Section 212 (a) (22) of Immigration and Nationality Act — Departed from or remained outside United States to evade or avoid military service. Where it is […]
MATTER OF BAIRES-LARIOS, 24 IN Dec. 467 (BIA 2008)
Interim Decision Number 3603 Matter of Heidy Hazel BAIRES-Larios, Respondent. File A42 474 527. Los Fresnos.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided March 10, 2008. A child who has satisfied the statutory conditions of former section 321(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1432(a) (1988), […]
IN THE MATTER OF LOK, 18 IN Dec. 101 (BIA 1981)
Interim Decision Number 2878 MATTER OF LOK. In Deportation Proceedings. A-31327663Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board July 31, 1981 (1) The lawful permanent resident status of an alien terminates within the meaning of section 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20), with […]
IN THE MATTER OF K—-, 2 IN Dec. 411 (BIA 1947)
IN THE MATTER OF K—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. 5906963Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board December 19, 1945. Approved by Attorney General January 7, 1946. Memorandum of Central Office August 12, 1946. Decided by Board February 26, 1947. Suspension of deportation — Section 19 (c) (2) […]
IN THE MATTER OF PEIGNAND, 13 IN Dec. 566 (BIA 1970)
Interim Decision Number 2044 MATTER OF PEIGNAND. In Deportation Proceedings. A-11862196Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board May 1, 1970 Since respondent, who was born out of wedlock on January 29, 1936, was never legitimated, he did not, through the naturalization of his mother in December […]
IN THE MATTER OF ANSELMO, 20 IN Dec. 25 (BIA 1989)
Interim Decision Number 3105 MATTER OF ANSELMO. In Deportation Proceedings. A-27529931Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board May 11, 1989. (1) The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held that the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) “covers deportation proceedings before the […]