MATTER OF C____ T____ P____. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-10344385Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board September 19, 1958 Misrepresentation — Section 212(a)(19) of the 1952 act — Materiality — Criteria for determining materiality in respect to visa application. Misrepresentations in visa application concerning parentage, whereabouts of […]
Category: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Opinions
IN RE C-C, 23 IN Dec. 899 (BIA 2006)
Interim Decision Number 3530 In re C____ C____, Respondent. Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided March 23, 2006. An alien seeking to reopen removal proceedings based on a claim that the birth of a second child in the United States will result in the alien’s forced sterilization […]
IN THE MATTER OF ALZONA, 14 IN Dec. 496 (BIA 1973)
Interim Decision Number 2246 MATTER OF ALZONA. In Deportation Proceedings. A-31419749Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board December 7, 1973 Where respondent’s United States citizen child was illegitimate under the law of the District of Columbia, the place of birth, the fact that the child was […]
IN THE MATTER OF S—- (HUSBAND AND WIFE), 4 IN Dec. 365 (BIA 1951)
IN THE MATTER OF S—- (HUSBAND AND WIFE). In EXCLUSION Proceedings. A-7948072 and A-7948073Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Central Office May 3, 1951 Subversive, proscribed organization — Member of an organization affiliated with the Communist Party of Russia — Act of 1918, as amended — […]
IN THE MATTER OF WONG, 12 IN Dec. 721 (BIA 1968)
Interim Decision Number 1860 MATTER OF WONG. In Deportation Proceedings. A-12649506.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board May 13, 1968. (1) Respondent’s plea of guilty in 1947 to a charge of unlawful possession of opium in violation of section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code […]
IN THE MATTER OF SCHUNCK, 14 IN Dec. 101 (BIA 1972)
Interim Decision Number 2137 MATTER OF SCHUNCK. In Deportation Proceedings. A-13120444Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 23, 1972. Conviction of a violation of section 11556 of the California Health and Safety Code, which provides “it is unlawful to visit or to be in any […]
IN RE E—-L—-H—-, 23 IN Dec. 700 (A.G. 2004)
Interim Decision Number 3506 In re E—-L—-H—- et al., Respondents. Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Attorney General December 1, 2004. Decided by Board January 30, 1998.[1] [1] The Board’s January 30, 1998, decision in this case was published as Matter of E—-L—-H—-, 22 IN Dec. […]
IN THE MATTER OF PRZYGOCKI, 17 IN Dec. 361 (BIA 1980)
Interim Decision Number 2789 MATTER OF PRZYGOCKI. In Deportation Proceedings. A-8241801Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 21, 1980 (1) In view of the absence of statutory and regulatory sanctions for “conditional” waivers of inadmissibility under section 212(c) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(c), no […]
IN THE MATTER OF SANTOS, 19 IN Dec. 105 (BIA 1984)
Interim Decision Number 2969 MATTER OF SANTOS. In Deportation Proceedings. A-24879910.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board June 26, 1984. (1) An alien must demonstrate that he has been prejudiced by a violation of a procedural rule or regulation before his deportation proceeding will be invalidated. […]
IN RE L-S-J-, 21 IN Dec. 973 (BIA 1997)
Interim Decision Number 3322 In re L-S-J-, Applicant Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided July 29, 1997 (1) An asylum applicant who has been convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon (handgun) and sentenced to 2½ years in prison is not eligible for asylum because he has […]