MATTER OF K—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-8178715.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 9, 1962. Deportability — Entry without inspection by falsely claiming United States citizenship — Exemption under section 241(f) of 1952 act, as amended — Effect of 8 CFR 242.7a. (1) Having been […]
Category: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Opinions
IN THE MATTER OF D—- W—- O—-, 5 IN Dec. 351 (BIA 1954)
IN THE MATTER OF D—- W—- O—- AND D—- W—- H—-. In EXCLUSION Proceedings. 0300-419637 and 0300-420204Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board July 31, 1953 Decided by the Board May 14, 1954 Paternity — United States citizenship, section 1993, revised statutes — Effect of […]
IN THE MATTER OF RODRIGUEZ, 11 IN Dec. 901 (BIA 1966)
Interim Decision Number 1670 MATTER OF RODRIGUEZ. In Section 245 Proceedings. A-12389347Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Regional Commissioner October 17, 1966 A native and citizen of Spain and permanent resident of Cuba who, following admission to the United States as a nonimmigrant visitor in 1960, […]
IN RE TIJAM, 22 IN Dec. 408 (BIA 1998)
Interim Decision Number 3372 In re Lumen Berina TIJAM, Respondent File 41236 021 Los AngelesBoard of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided December 10, 1998 (1) In making the discretionary determination on a waiver of deportability pursuant to section 241(a)(1)(H) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § […]
IN THE MATTER OF TARABOCCHIA, 10 IN Dec. 181 (BIA 1963)
Interim Decision Number 1266 MATTER OF TARABOCCHIA. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-7957351Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board February 11, 1963 An alien who entered the United States as a crewman is statutorily ineligible for suspension of deportation under the provisions of section 244(f) of the Immigration […]
IN THE MATTER OF KUMAH, 19 IN Dec. 290 (BIA 1985)
Interim Decision Number 2997 MATTER OF KUMAH. In Visa Petition Proceedings. A-20106357.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board October 15, 1985. (1) A court decree confirming a nonjudicial divorce under Ghanaian customary law issued by an appropriate Ghanaian court is accepted as evidence both that a […]
IN THE MATTER OF S—-, 5 IN Dec. 425 (BIA 1953)
IN THE MATTER OF S—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. E-13567 E-080049Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board August 14, 1953 Decided by the Board December 31, 1953 Crime involving moral turpitude — Selective Service Act of 1948, 50 U.S.C.A., Appendix 462 — Undesirable resident under section […]
IN THE MATTER OF I—-, 5 IN Dec. 343 (BIA 1953)
IN THE MATTER OF I—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. E-25308 (A-4771776)Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board July 21, 1953 Recommendation against deportation by convicting court prior to December 24, 1952 — Effect on deportability of alien under section 241 (b) (11) of the Immigration and […]
IN THE MATTER OF D—- L—- A—- M—-, 20 IN Dec. 409 (BIA 1991)
Interim Decision Number 3162 MATTER OF D—- L—- A—- M—-. In Exclusion Proceedings. A-29595639. A-29595640.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board October 16, 1991. Applicants for admission to the United States, who were not traveling in transit without visa status, are not excludable under section 212(a)(19) […]
MATTER OF M-A-M-, 25 IN Dec. 474 (BIA 5-4-2011)
Interim Decision Number 3711 Matter of M-A-M-, Respondent. Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided May 4, 2011. (1) Aliens in immigration proceedings are presumed to be competent and, if there are no indicia of incompetency in a case, no further inquiry regarding competency is required. (2) The […]