Interim Decision Number 3470 In re G—-C—-L—-, Respondent Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided April 10, 2002 The Board of Immigration Appeals withdraws from its policy of granting untimely motions to reopen by applicants claiming eligibility for asylum based solely on coercive population control policies, effective 90 […]
Category: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals Opinions
IN THE MATTER OF L—- Y—- Y—-, 9 IN Dec. 70 (A.G. 1960)
MATTER OF L—- Y—- Y—-. In DEPORTATION Proceedings. A-7139375.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Attorney General September 12, 1960. Parole — Section 212(d)(5) — Termination does not change status as applicant for admission. Termination of parole requires that alien’s case be continued in exclusion proceedings; […]
IN THE MATTER OF LIM, 13 IN Dec. 169 (BIA 1969)
Interim Decision Number 1947 MATTER OF LIM. In Deportation Proceedings. A-11422036Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board March 13, 1969 Respondent, who innocently entered as a nonquota immigrant without knowledge that her petitioning husband’s representation to be a U.S. citizen was fraudulent, comes within the purview […]
IN THE MATTER OF S.S. “HORNSHELL” ET AL., 1 IN Dec. 470 (BIA 1943)
IN THE MATTER OF THE S.S. “HORNSHELL” ET AL. In FINE Proceedings. 56096/807Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board June 18, 1943. Approved by the Attorney General. Fines — Section 20, Immigration Act of 1924 — Failure to comply with order to detain on board. […]
IN THE MATTER OF G—-, 1 IN Dec. 321 (BIA 1942)
IN THE MATTER OF G—-. IN EXCLUSION PROCEEDINGS. 56107/694Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by the Board October 13, 1942. Exclusion — Scope of review on appeal — Readmission of legally resident aliens — Section 13 (b), Immigration Act of 1924. 1. On appeal from an excluding […]
IN THE MATTER OF RODRIGUEZ-ESTEBAN, 20 IN Dec. 88 (BIA 1989)
Interim Decision Number 3115 MATTER OF RODRIGUEZ-ESTEBAN. In Deportation Proceedings. A-18234358.Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board July 13, 1989. The immigration judge and this Board lack jurisdiction in deportation proceedings to reconsider the order of the district director made in rescission proceedings. Matter of Saunders, […]
IN RE GONZALEZ-CAMARILLO, 21 IN Dec. 937 (BIA 1997)
Interim Decision Number 3320 in re Leoncio Crisoforo GONZALEZ-CAMARILLO, Respondent File A41 388 122 SeattleBoard of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided June 19, 1997 An alien who is deportable under sections 241(a)(2)(A)(iii) and (B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1251(a)(2)(A)(iii) and (B)(i) (1994), is […]
IN THE MATTER OF POLANCO, 20 IN Dec. 894 (BIA 1994)
Interim Decision Number 3232 MATTER OF POLANCO. In Deportation Proceedings. A-34403819Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided by Board October 21, 1994 (1) An alien who has waived or exhausted the right to a direct appeal of a conviction is subject to deportation, and the potential for discretionary […]
IN RE M-D, 24 IN Dec. 138 (BIA 2007)
Interim Decision Number 3561 In re M-D-, Respondent. Board of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided April 12, 2007 (1) When a case is remanded to an Immigration Judge for completion of the appropriate background checks, the Immigration Judge is required to enter a final order granting or denying […]
IN RE CHAIREZ, 21 IN Dec. 44 (BIA 1995)
Interim Decision Number 3248 In re Patricio CHAIREZ-Castaneda, Respondent File A41 311 303 AuroraBoard of Immigration Appeals Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Department of Justice Decided April 28, 1995 (1) A right to appeal such issues as whether a violation of probation has occurred or the sentence imposed upon entry of judgment was correct […]